Senior Research Fellow
- About
-
- Email Address
- steven.maclennan@abdn.ac.uk
- Telephone Number
- +44 (0)1224 438123
- Office Address
Academic Urology Unit Health Sciences Building (2nd Floor) University of Aberdeen Foresterhill Aberdeen AB25 2ZD Tel: +44 (0)1224 559086 Fax: +44 (0)1224 554580 Email: steven.maclennan@abdn.ac.uk
- School/Department
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition
Biography
Steven is a Research Fellow in the Academic Urology Unit at the University of Aberdeen. His research themes cover the broad spectrum of evidence-based medicine in urology. This encompasses assessing the effectiveness of treatments in clinical trials, developing core outcome sets, providing critical reviews of the evidence base, creating evidence-based (or where necessary consensus-based) clinical practice guidelines, and implementing guideline recommendations in clinical practice. Steven is a member of the European Association of Urology (EAU) methodology committee which oversees the quality of the EAU’s systematic review and clinical practice guideline programme and delivers training on core evidence-based medicine skills in systematic reviews and guideline production. He is also a founding member of the IMpact Assessment of Guidelines Implementation and Education (IMAGINE) group which aims to assess current variations in practice, investigate barriers and facilitators to guideline adherent practice, and improve adherence to strong, high level of evidence, guideline recommendations. Prostate Cancer DIagnOsis and TreatmeNt Enhancement through the Power of Big Data in EuRope (PIONEER) is one of Steven’s recent projects, where his heaviest involvement is in the work to help standardise outcome definitions across all stages of disease to support the Big Data analysis work and improve the consistency of outcome reporting, outcome definition and measurement in future clinical trials and clinical audit.
Qualifications
- PhD Sociology2010 - University of Edinburgh
- MRes Social Research Methods2006 - University of Aberdeen
- BA (Hons.) Applied Social Science2005 - The Robert Gordon University
Memberships and Affiliations
- Internal Memberships
-
IAHS Athena Swan Self Assessment Team
- External Memberships
-
European Association of Urology
- Research
-
Research Overview
An overview of current projects:
Core Outcome Set Development Projects
Renal Cancer Core Outcome Sets (R-COS)
In this project, part funded by the Arcobaleno Cancer Trust and NHS Grampian Endowments, we are developing three seperate Core Outcome Sets (COS) for localised, locally advanced, and metastatic stages of kidney cancer. This includes two systematic reviews, an interview study and three Delphi studies. The COMET registration, giving full study details is accessible here: https://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/1406
Bladder Cancer Core Outcome Sets (B-COS)
In this project, we are developing Core Outcome Sets for the various stages of bladder cancer. Forming the initial statge of the project, we published an article reviewing outcome reporting heterogeneity in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer - accessible here: https://content.iospress.com/articles/bladder-cancer/blc201510
The COMET registration, giving full study details is availabe here: https://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/1135
Prostate Cancer Core Outcome Sets
We devleoped a COS for localised prostate cancer. The results can be accessed here: https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bju.13854
Our prostate cancer COS work was subsequently updated and incorporated in the PIONEER project. More detail about PIONEER can be viewed here: https://prostate-pioneer.eu/
Implementation Science Projects
IMAGINE (IMpact Assessment of Guidelines Implementation and Education)
IMAGINE is a European Association of Urology (EAU) working group focussing on mapping adherence to EAU guidelines and, where variation or suboptimal practice is identified, investigating the barriers and facilitators to guideline adherence, and developing implementation interventions to adress the barriers and leverage the facilitators. You can read more about the IMAGINE group in this editorial
RESECT (Transurethral REsection and Single instillation intra-vesical chemotherapy Evaluation in bladder Cancer Treatment (RESECT) Improving quality in TURBT surgery.)
RESECT is a collaborative project with the British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) group, including researchers from the Academic Urology Unit and HSRU. A main aim of RESECT is to test intereventions aimed at improving adherence to guidelines around single instilation of chemotherapy adn documentation of the procudure - which have been shown to be associated with improved patient outcomes. You can read more about RESECT here: https://www.bursturology.com/Studies/Resect/Overview/
OPTIMA (OPtimal Treatment for patients wiht solid tumours in Europe through Artificial Intelligence)
OPTIMA is a 34 partners-based IMI project. The programme aim is to design, develop and deliver the first interoperable and GDPR-compliant European real-world oncology data and evidence generation platform based on the needs of the clinicians and patients, in an inclusive and sustainable way. It will be built on a combination of federated and centralised access to a vast network of European data providers to help answer the highest priority research questions in prostate, breast and lung cancer, especially where current existing evidence underpinning clinical practice guidelines is weak. In parallel, comprehensive decision support toolsets based on national and international guidelines with approved regular updates of guideline recommendations underpinned by evidence from advanced statistical analysis and AI will be made available to fill the guidelines gaps and better support shared decision making by clinicians and patients.
Deimplementing ADT
There is evidence to suggest that Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) is overused in men with localised prostate cancer. it is unclear why, and it is unclear what the best strategies for deimplementing ADT are. This reserach problem is the focus of Jennifer Dunsmore's PhD project, which Steven is supervising. You can read more about Jennifer and her reserach here: https://www.abdn.ac.uk/iahs/research/urology/metis/profiles/j.dunsmore.19
Guideline Development Projects
Steven sits on the European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Office Methodology Committee. This committee oversees the training of Guidelines Associates through Systematic Review workshops.
EVOLVE (giving patients a meaningful voice in the design and delivery of care)
EVOLVE is a unique collaboration of a profession society (European Association of Urology), guideline panels, researchers, clinicians and patient representatives to improve guideline development and implementation for genitourinary cancers in Europe. The aim of the project is to develop a model of patient involvement that will give patients a meaningful voice in the design and delivery of care and will investigate how wider stakeholders can help to integrate the patient voice into guidelines. You can read more about EVOLVE here: https://www.abdn.ac.uk/iahs/research/urology/metis/evolve-1618.php
- Teaching
-
Teaching Responsibilities
Steven contributes to the design, delivery and assessment of the MSc. level courses in the Institute of Applied Health Sciences linked above. He also supervises MSc. dissertations and often supervises medical student summer placements in the Aberdeen Summer Research Scholarship (ASRS) programme.
Steven currently supervises two PhD. projects and is intersted in supervising any project aligning with his broad interests in the desing and delivery of urology health services.
Non-course Teaching Responsibilities
Alongside formal teaching at the University of Aberdeen, Steven and his colleagues also developed a 2.5 day course for the European Association of Urology (EAU) on systematic reviews for clinical practice guidelines.
Steven also teaches the systematic review element for the European Organisaiton for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 'clinical trial statistics for non-statisticians' course. https://event.eortc.org/stats2021/
- Publications
-
Page 4 of 6 Results 76 to 100 of 145
EAU-ESMO Consensus Statements on the Management of Advanced and Variant Bladder Cancer-An International Collaborative Multistakeholder Effort: Under the Auspices of the EAU-ESMO Guidelines Committees
European Urology, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 223-250Contributions to Journals: Articles- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.017
- [OPEN ACCESS] http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/15380/1/EAU_ESMO_Bladder_Cancer_Consensus_Eur_Urol_MANUSCRIPT_AND_TABLES_AAM.pdf
- [OPEN ACCESS] http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/15380/2/EAU_ESMO_Bladder_Cancer_Consensus_Eur_Urol_SI_Appendix_AAM.pdf
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Prostate Cancer Guideline Panel Consensus statements for deferred treatment with curative intent for localised prostate cancer from an international collaborative study (DETECTIVE Study)
European Urology, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 790-813Contributions to Journals: Articles- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.020
- [OPEN ACCESS] http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/15196/2/Lam_SJM_EAU_EANM_ESTRO_ESUR_SIOG_AAM.pdf
- [OPEN ACCESS] http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/15196/1/Lam_et_al_EuropeanUrology_EAU_EANM_Tables_AAM.pdf
- [ONLINE] View publication in Scopus
EAU Guidelines Systematic Reviews Methods and Processes Handbook: (December 2019)
European Association of Urology. 29 pagesBooks and Reports: Commissioned Reports. PIONEER’s systematic review of outcomes reported in effectiveness trials for interventions in locally advanced prostate cancer
11th European Multidisciplinary Congress on Urological CancersContributions to Conferences: AbstractsPIONEER’s update and integration of a localised prostate cancer core outcome set for effectiveness trials and a standard set for clinical practice
11th European Multidisciplinary Congress on Urological CancersContributions to Conferences: AbstractsEAU–ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer—an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees
Annals of Oncology, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1697–1727Contributions to Journals: ArticlesPIONEER: a BD4BO (Big data for better outcome) prostate cancer project
The 26th Annual Scientific Retreat of Prostate Cancer FoundationContributions to Conferences: AbstractsTreatment of Bladder Stones in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Behalf of the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guideline Panel
European Urology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 352-367Contributions to Journals: ArticlesConsensus in Bladder Cancer Research Priorities Between Patients and Healthcare Professionals Using a Four-stage Modified Delphi Method
European Urology, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 258-259Contributions to Journals: Letters- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.031
- [OPEN ACCESS] http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/13627/1/Research_letter_EAU_FINAL_0701.pdf
- [ONLINE] View publication in Mendeley
- [ONLINE] View publication in Scopus
- [ONLINE] https://abdn.pure.elsevier.com/en/en/researchoutput/consensus-in-bladder-cancer-research-priorities-between-patients-and-healthcare-professionals-using-a-fourstage-modified-delphi-method(67d9bba7-9db7-42f8-953e-1244c0b7fe17).html
Reply to Jon Mikel Inarritu, Daniele Castellani, and Jeremy Y.C. Teoh's Letter to the Editor re: Agustina Bessa, Steven Maclennan, Deborah Enting, et al. Consensus in Bladder Cancer Research Priorities Between Patients and Healthcare Professionals Using a Four-stage Modified Delphi Method. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.031
European Urology, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 45-46Contributions to Journals: Letters- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.05.006
- [ONLINE] View publication in Mendeley
- [ONLINE] View publication in Scopus
- [ONLINE] https://abdn.pure.elsevier.com/en/en/researchoutput/reply-to-jon-mikel-inarritu-daniele-castellani-and-jeremy-yc-teohs-letter-to-the-editor-re(7e47fec6-29d4-45eb-a750-413b2f2f153c).html
Is there outcome reporting heterogeneity in studies which aim to assess the effectiveness of surgical treatments for stress urinary incontinence in women?
Contributions to Journals: Registered ReportsPIONEER’s update and integration of a metastatic prostate cancer core outcome set for effectiveness trials and a standard set for clinical practice
ICHOM 2019Contributions to Conferences: AbstractsStudy Protocol for the DETECTIVE Study: An International Collaborative Study To Develop Consensus Statements for Deferred Treatment with Curative Intent for Localised Prostate Cancer
European Urology, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 699-702Contributions to Journals: Articles- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.009
- [OPEN ACCESS] http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/13291/1/Protocol_for_submission_to_Eur_Urol_as_a_brief_correspondence_TL_v5_SMkpNM_TL_FINAL_v3.pdf
- [ONLINE] View publication in Scopus
- [ONLINE] View publication in Mendeley
- [ONLINE] https://abdn.pure.elsevier.com/en/en/researchoutput/study-protocol-for-the-detective-study(2553c3d4-dd79-4810-9cdd-a268bb94753a).html
PIONEER’s update and integration of a localised prostate cancer core outcome set for effectiveness trials and a standard set for clinical practice
34th Annual European Association of Urology Congress, pp. PT342Contributions to Conferences: PostersEVOLVE: Designing a model of meaningful patient involvement in guideline development
European Urology Supplements, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. e2117Contributions to Journals: Articles- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1569-9056(19)31534-9
Is Nonoperative Management the Best First-line Option for High-grade Renal trauma? A Systematic Review
European Urology Focus, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 290-300Contributions to Journals: Review articlesOncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy Versus Open Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An European Association of Urology Guidelines Systematic Review
European Urology Focus, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 205-223Contributions to Journals: Review articles- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.10.003
- [ONLINE] View publication in Scopus
- [ONLINE] View publication in Mendeley
Potential Benefit of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
European Urology Focus, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 224-241Contributions to Journals: Review articles- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.09.015
- [ONLINE] View publication in Scopus
- [ONLINE] View publication in Mendeley
Knowledge Transfer and Guidelines Implementation in Genitourinary Cancers
European Urology Oncology, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 426-427Contributions to Journals: EditorialsThe Impact of Implementation of the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel Recommendations on Reporting and Grading Complications on Perioperative Outcomes after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
European Urology, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 4-7Contributions to Journals: ArticlesRisks and Benefits of Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Node-positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review by the European Association of Urology Penile Cancer Guidelines Panel
European Urology, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 76-83Contributions to Journals: ArticlesProtocol for a systematic review of outcome reporting, definition and measurement of heterogeneity in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer effectiveness trials of adjuvant, prophylactic treatment after transurethral resection
Contributions to Journals: Registered ReportsCare pathways for the management of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer:: Experience of the EAU guidelines office
33rd Annual EAU Congress 2018, pp. PT075Contributions to Conferences: PostersHow to resolve discrepancies when findings from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses disagree?
33rd Annual EAU Congress 2018Contributions to Conferences: PostersKey steps in conducting systematic reviews for underpinning clinical practice guidelines:: Methodology of the European Association of Urology
33rd Annual EAU Congress 2018, pp. PT001Contributions to Conferences: Posters