Senior Research Fellow
- About
-
- Email Address
- steven.maclennan@abdn.ac.uk
- Telephone Number
- +44 (0)1224 438123
- Office Address
Academic Urology Unit Health Sciences Building (2nd Floor) University of Aberdeen Foresterhill Aberdeen AB25 2ZD Tel: +44 (0)1224 559086 Fax: +44 (0)1224 554580 Email: steven.maclennan@abdn.ac.uk
- School/Department
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition
Biography
Steven is a Research Fellow in the Academic Urology Unit at the University of Aberdeen. His research themes cover the broad spectrum of evidence-based medicine in urology. This encompasses assessing the effectiveness of treatments in clinical trials, developing core outcome sets, providing critical reviews of the evidence base, creating evidence-based (or where necessary consensus-based) clinical practice guidelines, and implementing guideline recommendations in clinical practice. Steven is a member of the European Association of Urology (EAU) methodology committee which oversees the quality of the EAU’s systematic review and clinical practice guideline programme and delivers training on core evidence-based medicine skills in systematic reviews and guideline production. He is also a founding member of the IMpact Assessment of Guidelines Implementation and Education (IMAGINE) group which aims to assess current variations in practice, investigate barriers and facilitators to guideline adherent practice, and improve adherence to strong, high level of evidence, guideline recommendations. Prostate Cancer DIagnOsis and TreatmeNt Enhancement through the Power of Big Data in EuRope (PIONEER) is one of Steven’s recent projects, where his heaviest involvement is in the work to help standardise outcome definitions across all stages of disease to support the Big Data analysis work and improve the consistency of outcome reporting, outcome definition and measurement in future clinical trials and clinical audit.
Qualifications
- PhD Sociology2010 - University of Edinburgh
- MRes Social Research Methods2006 - University of Aberdeen
- BA (Hons.) Applied Social Science2005 - The Robert Gordon University
Memberships and Affiliations
- Internal Memberships
-
IAHS Athena Swan Self Assessment Team
- External Memberships
-
European Association of Urology
- Research
-
Research Overview
An overview of current projects:
Core Outcome Set Development Projects
Renal Cancer Core Outcome Sets (R-COS)
In this project, part funded by the Arcobaleno Cancer Trust and NHS Grampian Endowments, we are developing three seperate Core Outcome Sets (COS) for localised, locally advanced, and metastatic stages of kidney cancer. This includes two systematic reviews, an interview study and three Delphi studies. The COMET registration, giving full study details is accessible here: https://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/1406
Bladder Cancer Core Outcome Sets (B-COS)
In this project, we are developing Core Outcome Sets for the various stages of bladder cancer. Forming the initial statge of the project, we published an article reviewing outcome reporting heterogeneity in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer - accessible here: https://content.iospress.com/articles/bladder-cancer/blc201510
The COMET registration, giving full study details is availabe here: https://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/1135
Prostate Cancer Core Outcome Sets
We devleoped a COS for localised prostate cancer. The results can be accessed here: https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bju.13854
Our prostate cancer COS work was subsequently updated and incorporated in the PIONEER project. More detail about PIONEER can be viewed here: https://prostate-pioneer.eu/
Implementation Science Projects
IMAGINE (IMpact Assessment of Guidelines Implementation and Education)
IMAGINE is a European Association of Urology (EAU) working group focussing on mapping adherence to EAU guidelines and, where variation or suboptimal practice is identified, investigating the barriers and facilitators to guideline adherence, and developing implementation interventions to adress the barriers and leverage the facilitators. You can read more about the IMAGINE group in this editorial
RESECT (Transurethral REsection and Single instillation intra-vesical chemotherapy Evaluation in bladder Cancer Treatment (RESECT) Improving quality in TURBT surgery.)
RESECT is a collaborative project with the British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) group, including researchers from the Academic Urology Unit and HSRU. A main aim of RESECT is to test intereventions aimed at improving adherence to guidelines around single instilation of chemotherapy adn documentation of the procudure - which have been shown to be associated with improved patient outcomes. You can read more about RESECT here: https://www.bursturology.com/Studies/Resect/Overview/
OPTIMA (OPtimal Treatment for patients wiht solid tumours in Europe through Artificial Intelligence)
OPTIMA is a 34 partners-based IMI project. The programme aim is to design, develop and deliver the first interoperable and GDPR-compliant European real-world oncology data and evidence generation platform based on the needs of the clinicians and patients, in an inclusive and sustainable way. It will be built on a combination of federated and centralised access to a vast network of European data providers to help answer the highest priority research questions in prostate, breast and lung cancer, especially where current existing evidence underpinning clinical practice guidelines is weak. In parallel, comprehensive decision support toolsets based on national and international guidelines with approved regular updates of guideline recommendations underpinned by evidence from advanced statistical analysis and AI will be made available to fill the guidelines gaps and better support shared decision making by clinicians and patients.
Deimplementing ADT
There is evidence to suggest that Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) is overused in men with localised prostate cancer. it is unclear why, and it is unclear what the best strategies for deimplementing ADT are. This reserach problem is the focus of Jennifer Dunsmore's PhD project, which Steven is supervising. You can read more about Jennifer and her reserach here: https://www.abdn.ac.uk/iahs/research/urology/metis/profiles/j.dunsmore.19
Guideline Development Projects
Steven sits on the European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Office Methodology Committee. This committee oversees the training of Guidelines Associates through Systematic Review workshops.
EVOLVE (giving patients a meaningful voice in the design and delivery of care)
EVOLVE is a unique collaboration of a profession society (European Association of Urology), guideline panels, researchers, clinicians and patient representatives to improve guideline development and implementation for genitourinary cancers in Europe. The aim of the project is to develop a model of patient involvement that will give patients a meaningful voice in the design and delivery of care and will investigate how wider stakeholders can help to integrate the patient voice into guidelines. You can read more about EVOLVE here: https://www.abdn.ac.uk/iahs/research/urology/metis/evolve-1618.php
- Teaching
-
Teaching Responsibilities
Steven contributes to the design, delivery and assessment of the MSc. level courses in the Institute of Applied Health Sciences linked above. He also supervises MSc. dissertations and often supervises medical student summer placements in the Aberdeen Summer Research Scholarship (ASRS) programme.
Steven currently supervises two PhD. projects and is intersted in supervising any project aligning with his broad interests in the desing and delivery of urology health services.
Non-course Teaching Responsibilities
Alongside formal teaching at the University of Aberdeen, Steven and his colleagues also developed a 2.5 day course for the European Association of Urology (EAU) on systematic reviews for clinical practice guidelines.
Steven also teaches the systematic review element for the European Organisaiton for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 'clinical trial statistics for non-statisticians' course. https://event.eortc.org/stats2021/
- Publications
-
Page 3 of 6 Results 51 to 75 of 145
A Systematic Review of Outcome Reporting, Definition and Measurement Heterogeneity in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Effectiveness Trials of Adjuvant, Prophylactic Treatment after Transurethral Resection
Bladder Cancer, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 221-241Contributions to Journals: Review articlesNon-antibiotic strategies for the prevention of infectious complications following prostate biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Journal of Urology, vol. 205, no. 3, pp. 653-663Contributions to Journals: ArticlesIMAGINE-IMpact Assessment of Guidelines Implementation and Education: The Next Frontier for Harmonising Urological Practice Across Europe by Improving Adherence to Guidelines
European Urology, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 173-176Contributions to Journals: Articles- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.10.011
- [OPEN ACCESS] http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/17404/1/IMAGINE_ImpactAssessment_AAM.pdf
- [ONLINE] View publication in Scopus
Consensus Statements on PSMA PET/CT Response Assessment Criteria in Prostate Cancer
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 469–476Contributions to Journals: ArticlesDiagnostic and prognostic factors in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review protocol
BMJ Open, vol. 11, no. 2, e040531Contributions to Journals: Articles- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040531
- [OPEN ACCESS] http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/15928/1/1_s2.0_S0302283821000634_main.pdf
- [ONLINE] View publication in Scopus
Providing a Framework for Meaningful Patient Involvement in Clinical Practice Guideline Development and Implementation
European Urology Focus, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 947-950Contributions to Journals: ArticlesThe Key Role of Patient Involvement in the Development of Core Outcome Sets in Prostate Cancer
European Urology FocusContributions to Journals: ArticlesRe: Antibiotic Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Infectious Complications following Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Journal of Urology, vol. 204, no. 6, pp. 1350-1351Contributions to Journals: Letters- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001333
“Vicarious thinking” is a key driver of score change in Delphi surveys for COS development and is facilitated by feedback of results
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 128, pp. 118-129Contributions to Journals: ArticlesIs there outcome reporting heterogeneity in trials which aim to assess the effectiveness of surgical treatments for Stress Urinary Incontinence in women?
35th Annual EAU CongressContributions to Conferences: AbstractsPIONEER’s systematic review of outcomes in RCTs of men with non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: Is there a need for a core outcome set?
35th Annual EAU CongressContributions to Conferences: AbstractsInitial steps of an online search tool development for diagnostic and prognostic factors in prostate cancer
12th European Multidisciplinary Congress on Urological Cancers 2020Contributions to Conferences: AbstractsPIONEER’s operational definitions:: Harmonising clinical characteristics and phenotypes data of prostate cancer patients
12th European Multidisciplinary Congress on Urological Cancers 2020Contributions to Conferences: AbstractsIdentifying the most appropriate instrument for patient reported outcome measure (PROMS) in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer
12th European Multidisciplinary Congress on Urological Cancers 2020Contributions to Conferences: AbstractsPIONEER consensus on clinician reported outcome measurements
12th European Multidisciplinary Congress on Urological Cancers 2020Contributions to Conferences: AbstractsAn International Collaborative Consensus Statement on En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumour Incorporating Two Systematic Reviews, a Two-round Delphi Survey and a Consensus Meeting
European Urology, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 546-569Contributions to Journals: ArticlesWhat are the unmet supportive care needs of men affected by penile cancer? A systematic review of the empirical evidence
European Journal of Oncology Nursing, vol. 48, 101805Contributions to Journals: Review articles- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101805
- [ONLINE] View publication in Scopus
EVOLVE: a framework for meaningful patient involvement in clinical practice guideline development and implementation
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 9 Suppl 1, pp. 26Contributions to Journals: AbstractsAntibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of infectious complications following prostate biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Journal of Urology, vol. 204, no. 2, pp. 224-230Contributions to Journals: Review articles- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000814
- [ONLINE] View publication in Scopus
Author Correction: Introducing PIONEER: a project to harness big data in prostate cancer research (Nature Reviews Urology, (2020), 17, 6, (351-362), 10.1038/s41585-020-0324-x)
Nature Reviews Urology, vol. 17, pp. 482Contributions to Journals: Comments and Debates- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-020-0355-3
- [ONLINE] View publication in Scopus
- [ONLINE] Springer Nature SharedIt link to author correction.
PIONEER-Prioritisation of the most important questions in the field of prostate cancer
35th Annual EAU CongressContributions to Conferences: AbstractsPIONEER: European Commission Innovative Medicines Initiative funded BD4BO (Big data for better outcome) project on prostate cancer
35th Annual EAU CongressContributions to Conferences: AbstractsA systematic review of heterogeneity in outcome definition and reporting in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) effectiveness trials of adjuvant treatment after transurethral resection
35th Annual EAU CongressContributions to Conferences: AbstractsIntroducing PIONEER: a project to harness big data in prostate cancer research
Nature reviews. Urology, vol. 17, pp. 351-362Contributions to Journals: Articles- [ONLINE] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-020-0355-3
- [OPEN ACCESS] http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/15415/1/Omar_NRU_AAM_In_principle.pdf
- [ONLINE] View publication in Scopus
The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol
Trials, vol. 21, 479Contributions to Journals: Articles