- The UK REF2014 was the largest assessment of University research in the world.
- 76% of the University's research has been rated 'world leading' or 'internationally excellent' in the Research Excellence Framework (REF2014)
For additional information on the REF2014, please visit the HEFCE REF2014 website .
|
Table of Results
The full results for the University's submissions are listed below.*
Arts and Social Sciences |
Unit of Assessment |
FTE Category A staff |
4* |
3* |
2* |
1* |
U |
16
|
Architecture, Built Environment and Planning
|
10.4
|
39
|
47
|
12
|
2
|
0
|
18
|
Economics and Econometrics
|
19.25
|
3
|
51
|
37
|
9
|
0
|
19
|
Business and Management Studies
|
13.3
|
31
|
42
|
25
|
2
|
0
|
20
|
Law
|
23.4
|
15
|
49
|
33
|
3
|
0
|
21
|
Politics and International Studies
|
11.2
|
7
|
43
|
37
|
13
|
0
|
23
|
Sociology
|
13
|
14
|
58
|
28
|
0
|
0
|
24
|
Anthropology and Development Studies
|
11
|
23
|
35
|
37
|
5
|
0
|
25
|
Education
|
9.6
|
8
|
59
|
29
|
4
|
0
|
28
|
Modern Languages and Linguistics
|
22
|
21
|
41
|
26
|
12
|
0
|
29
|
English Language and Literature
|
21.5
|
31
|
62
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
30
|
History
|
24
|
26
|
44
|
29
|
1
|
0
|
32
|
Philosophy
|
13.25
|
31
|
31
|
20
|
18
|
0
|
33
|
Theology and Religious Studies
|
19
|
29
|
39
|
24
|
7
|
1
|
35
|
Music, Drama, Dance and Performing Arts
|
11.36
|
15
|
51
|
23
|
8
|
3
|
|
Life Sciences and Medicine |
Unit of Assessment |
FTE Category A staff |
4* |
3* |
2* |
1* |
U |
01
|
Clinical Medicine
|
54.3
|
25
|
42
|
31
|
1
|
1
|
02
|
Public Health, Health Services and Primary Care
|
47.5
|
34
|
47
|
19
|
0
|
0
|
04
|
Psychology, Psychiatry an Neuroscience
|
20.6
|
29
|
65
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
05
|
Biological Sciences
|
89.42
|
30
|
53
|
16
|
0
|
1
|
06
|
Agriculture, Veterinary and Food Science
|
20.4
|
56
|
36
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
|
Physical Sciences |
Unit of Assessment |
FTE Category A staff |
4* |
3* |
2* |
1* |
U |
07
|
Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
|
28.4
|
18
|
71
|
10
|
1
|
0
|
08
|
Chemistry
|
20.2
|
14
|
66
|
20
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
Mathematical Sciences
|
23.1
|
14
|
62
|
24
|
0
|
0
|
11
|
Computer Science and Informatics
|
19
|
22
|
52
|
26
|
0
|
0
|
15
|
General Engineering
|
38.6
|
12
|
70
|
18
|
0
|
0
|
16
|
Architecture, Built Environment and Planning
|
10.4
|
39
|
47
|
12
|
2
|
0
|
17
|
Geography, Environmental Studies and Archaeology
|
13.4
|
13
|
53
|
32
|
2
|
0
|
|
*Results downloaded from http://ref2014tool.analytics.elsevier.com/overall/internal_results REF 2014 Results Analysis Tool is developed by Elsevier Analytical Services, part of Elsevier Research Intelligence Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
|
Top in Scotland for Performance
(4*+3* research ratings combined)
- 1st in Public Health, Health Services and Primary Care
- 1st in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences (Geology and Geosciences)
Top in Scotland for Impact
- 1st in Public Health, Health Services and Primary Care
- 1st in Business and Management
- 1st in Chemistry
- 1st in Divinity
- 1st in Geosciences
- 1st in History
View examples of the University's impact
Top in the UK for Performance
- 1st in Agriculture, Veterinary and Food Science (Soil and Environmental Science)
(4*+3* research ratings combined)
- 2nd in the UK for English Language and Literature
- 3rd in the UK for Psychology and Psychiatry
- 5th in the UK for Architecture, Built Environment and Planning (Property and Transport)
UK Outstanding Impact
For the first time research was rated in terms of real world impact.
- 85% of all submissions rated 'outstanding' or 'very considerable' for impact (4*+3*)
- 1st (joint) in the UK for Agriculture, Veterinary and Food Science (Soil and Environmental Science)
- 2nd in the UK for Business and Management Studies
- 2nd in the UK for History
View examples of the University's impact
|
The REF2014 assed three key research areas, as follows:
- Research Outputs (65%)
- Research Impact (20%)
- Research Environment (15%)
The most important of these wss the assessment of research outputs. Each academic member of staff who is selected for submission will normally have to provide four research outputs for inclusion. These were assessed by the sub-Panels. Approximately half of the sub-Panels (mainly in the STEM subjects) took into account the citation counts of the submitted research outputs to inform their decisions. Assessment of research outputs accounted for 65% of each submission's overall quality rating. The citation counts wereprovided to the REF panels via Scopus, and refered to the research outputs submitted.
After the research output element of the assessment exercise, the non-academic impact of research is the next most significant area to be assessed. This was also assessed by Unit of Assessment, via submission of a pre-determined number of “impact case studies” (number of case studies varying dependant on FTE per Unit) and by assessing how the research environment and research strategy within each Unit supports and facilitates non-academic research impact. The assessment of research impact was new to the REF2014 and accounted for 20% of the overall quality profile within each Unit.
The research output and impact elements of each submission was accompanied by a narrative which described the research environment of each Unit of Assessment. The “research environment” element of the assessment accounted for 15% of each submission. The research environment element assesses research facilities, research strategy, research metrics, career development opportunities, with particular emphasis on early career researchers and postgraduate students, and on equality and diversity issues.
For further information on how submissions were assessed, please access;
Alternatively, these documents are available on the HEFCE website.
|
For the overall quality profile for each Unit of Assessment the quality ratings are as follows:
Rating
|
Definition
|
4*
|
Quality that is world leading in terms of originality, significance and rigour
|
3*
|
Quality that is internationally excellent in terms of originality, significance and rigour but which falls short of the highest standards of excellence
|
2*
|
Quality that is recognised internationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour
|
1*
|
Quality that is recognised nationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour
|
Unclassified
|
Quality that falls below the standard of nationally recognised work. Or work which does not meet the published definition of research for the purposes of this assessment
|
For each of the three elements of the assessment - outputs, impact and environment - sub-panels will develop a sub-profile, showing the proportion of the submission that meets each of four starred quality levels.
- View the assessment criteria and the definitions of the starred levels for the sub-profiles
|
Final decisions on the selection of staff for submission to the exercise were made by the institutional REF2014 Steering Group, in consultation with the Colleges. The REF2014 Steering Group has overarching responsibility for managing and coordinating the University's submission to the REF2014. Decisions on inclusion for submission will be based entirely on research quality.
In making decisions on inclusion, the University, via the REF2014 Steering Group, adhered to its internal REF2014 Equality and Diversity Code of Practice, as required by the Funding Councils. The University's REF2014 Equality and Diversity Code of Practice was approved via the University Court at its meeting on 6 December 2011 and was submitted to the national REF2014 Team (HEFCE) for formal approval.
|
Please find a number of documents key REF2014 below.
Impact Related Links:
In order to access the additional documentation on Impact listed below, as released by HEFCE following the Impact Pilot Exercise (2010);
- HEFCE Impact Pilot Exercise Expert Panel Findings.
- Feedback from the Higher Education Institutions Involved in the Pilot.
- Examples of impact case studies best practice, as submitted to the pilot exercise
Please visit the following link: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/rsrch/REFimpact/
|