Last modified: 12 Aug 2024 15:16
What makes an argument a good argument? What are the correct rules for reasoning? How should we revise our beliefs in the light of new evidence? What should we think about paradoxes?
This course provides an introduction to logic and tools for successfully evaluating arguments. Some of the topics covered include validity, soundness, consistency, entailment, provability, belief revision and paradoxes. The language of propositional logic and key ideas in Bayesian epistemology are introduced. The course develops the ability to symbolise English sentences into formal languages and to construct truth tables, truth trees and natural deduction proofs. Logical concepts are applied to everyday thinking as well as to philosophical puzzles and paradoxes.
| Study Type | Undergraduate | Level | 1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Term | Second Term | Credit Points | 15 credits (7.5 ECTS credits) |
| Campus | Aberdeen | Sustained Study | No |
| Co-ordinators |
|
||
What makes an argument a good argument? What are the correct rules for reasoning? How should we revise our beliefs in the light of new evidence? What should we think about paradoxes?
This course provides an introduction to logic and tools for successfully evaluating arguments. Some of the topics covered include validity, soundness, consistency, entailment, provability, belief revision and paradoxes. The language of propositional logic and key ideas in Bayesian epistemology are introduced. The course develops the ability to symbolise English sentences into formal languages and to construct truth tables, truth trees and natural deduction proofs. Logical concepts are applied to everyday thinking as well as to philosophical puzzles and paradoxes.
Information on contact teaching time is available from the course guide.
| Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment Weeks | Feedback Weeks | |||
| Feedback |
Feedback provided via MyAberdeen: individual scripts scored, solution document posted and explanatory video of solutions posted. Indicative Assessment week: teaching week 7; indicative Feedback week: teaching week 10 |
|||
| Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Conceptual | Analyse | Develop critical thinking skills to understand how language and reasoning work. This will give them the skills to better evaluate real world arguments in situations ranging from politics to medicine |
| Conceptual | Evaluate | Enhance ability to clearly articulate flaws in arguments and reasoning practices. This provides students with the ability to not only get to the truth, but also the ability to help others get there |
| Procedural | Create | Learn how to apply abstract logical approaches to a variety of applications in diverse areas of research. Provide the foundation to apply skills developed into new areas and in their lives generally |
| Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment Weeks | Feedback Weeks | |||
| Feedback |
Feedback provided via MyAberdeen: individual scripts scored, solution document posted and explanatory video of solutions posted. Indicative Assessment week: teaching week 12; indicative Feedback week: teaching week 15 |
|||
| Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Conceptual | Analyse | Develop critical thinking skills to understand how language and reasoning work. This will give them the skills to better evaluate real world arguments in situations ranging from politics to medicine |
| Conceptual | Evaluate | Enhance ability to clearly articulate flaws in arguments and reasoning practices. This provides students with the ability to not only get to the truth, but also the ability to help others get there |
| Procedural | Create | Learn how to apply abstract logical approaches to a variety of applications in diverse areas of research. Provide the foundation to apply skills developed into new areas and in their lives generally |
There are no assessments for this course.
| Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 100 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment Weeks | Feedback Weeks | |||
| Feedback | ||||
| Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
| Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Procedural | Create | Learn how to apply abstract logical approaches to a variety of applications in diverse areas of research. Provide the foundation to apply skills developed into new areas and in their lives generally |
| Conceptual | Evaluate | Enhance ability to clearly articulate flaws in arguments and reasoning practices. This provides students with the ability to not only get to the truth, but also the ability to help others get there |
| Conceptual | Analyse | Develop critical thinking skills to understand how language and reasoning work. This will give them the skills to better evaluate real world arguments in situations ranging from politics to medicine |
We have detected that you are have compatibility mode enabled or are using an old version of Internet Explorer. You either need to switch off compatibility mode for this site or upgrade your browser.
