Last modified: 05 Oct 2023 08:46
You will learn how different qualitative methodologies can enhance our understanding of people. Building on from Thematic Analysis that you are now familiar with, this course will explain what other methodologies there are and what they can be used for, including conversation analysis, narrative analysis, grounded theory and interpretative phenomenological analysis.
Lectures will be semi-flipped, in that you will be asked to do some reading beforehand, which will be the basis for interactive elements within the lecture.
Note that some of the research articles included are on topics that may be sensitive, e.g., grief, suicide and eating disorders.
Study Type | Undergraduate | Level | 4 |
---|---|---|---|
Term | Second Term | Credit Points | 15 credits (7.5 ECTS credits) |
Campus | Aberdeen | Sustained Study | No |
Co-ordinators |
|
This course is both a broadening and a deepening of the qualitative research that you have learnt about in Level 3. We will look at 4 main methodologies that build on from Thematic Analysis.
For each methodology we will look at the steps involved in carrying it out. We will also look at research articles that have used them, so you will get a firm grasp of which methodology is appropriate for which type of research question. In addition, we will critically evaluate articles in terms of how well the chosen methodology was done.
The main methodologies covered in the course are:
Conversation analysis: this methodology assumes that people are performing actions when they say things. Turn-by-turn talk can be analysed for specific actions, such as ‘repair’ (rectifying someone’s misunderstanding), ‘saying no’ (without actually saying no), ‘summoning’ (without literally asking for it). It is usually done on naturally occurring talk and we will apply it to how couples argue and how people produce gender identities when they talk.
Narrative analysis: this methodology tries to understand people through the stories they tell about themselves. Narrative interviews are usually unstructured and are analysed by looking at particular story features, such as ‘who is the protagonist?’, ‘what type of story is it?’, ‘what is the role of the other characters in the story?’. This methodology is often used for studies on identity development.
Grounded theory: this is a methodology best applied to understanding processes. The aim is to build a theory that is grounded in (i.e., based on) the data that can explain how the process works. For example, grounded theory can be used to explain how the evolving nature of ‘pride’ can contribute to developing, maintaining, and recovering from eating disorders.
Interpretative phenomenological analysis: this is a highly idiographic methodology that aims to understand the experiences of individuals. Sample sizes are usually very small. The data analysis looks similar to Thematic Analysis, except that it is done on one person and the focus is specifically on phenomenology. For instance, we will look at studies that have used this methodology to understand the experiences of Autistic people.
Please note that some of the research articles include sensitive topics such as grief, self-harm, suicide and eating disorders.
Information on contact teaching time is available from the course guide.
Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 90 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | 18 | Feedback Weeks | 20 | |
Feedback |
This is a standard essay-style exam, where students have to answer 2 questions (out of a choice of 4). It will be done online and is open-book. |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Conceptual | Apply | Being able to apply the methodologies covered to specific research questions. |
Conceptual | Understand | Being able to describe what reflexivity is, i.e., how a researcher’s background may influence their data interpretation. |
Factual | Remember | Being able to describe various different ontological and epistemological viewpoints associated with the methodologies covered. |
Factual | Remember | Being able to describe the features of several qualitative methodologies. |
Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | 13 | Feedback Weeks | ||
Feedback |
This is a mid-semester online MCQ based on the close-reading of one research article. |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Conceptual | Analyse | Being able to recognize various different ontological and epistemological viewpoints when reading a research article. |
Conceptual | Analyse | Being able to recognize reflexivity when reading a research article. |
Conceptual | Evaluate | Being able to evaluate a research article in terms of the rigour of the methodology. |
Assessment Type | Formative | Weighting | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | Feedback Weeks | |||
Feedback |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
|
Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | Feedback Weeks | |||
Feedback |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
|
Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 90 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | Feedback Weeks | |||
Feedback |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
|
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Factual | Remember | Being able to describe the features of several qualitative methodologies. |
Conceptual | Apply | Being able to apply the methodologies covered to specific research questions. |
Conceptual | Evaluate | Being able to evaluate a research article in terms of the rigour of the methodology. |
Factual | Remember | Being able to describe various different ontological and epistemological viewpoints associated with the methodologies covered. |
Conceptual | Analyse | Being able to recognize various different ontological and epistemological viewpoints when reading a research article. |
Conceptual | Understand | Being able to describe what reflexivity is, i.e., how a researcher’s background may influence their data interpretation. |
Conceptual | Analyse | Being able to recognize reflexivity when reading a research article. |
We have detected that you are have compatibility mode enabled or are using an old version of Internet Explorer. You either need to switch off compatibility mode for this site or upgrade your browser.