Last modified: 23 Jul 2024 11:08
Advanced clinical practitioners must engage with quality and safety improvement. Most adverse events are medication-related, so drug safety competencies are essential. Human Factors explores how people interact with work systems. This course introduces systems-thinking principles and a ‘Human Factors toolkit’ to support safety, quality and better learning from adverse events. This course is for those interested in patient safety, especially those undertaking non-medical prescribing courses.
Study Type | Postgraduate | Level | 5 |
---|---|---|---|
Term | Second Term | Credit Points | 15 credits (7.5 ECTS credits) |
Campus | Aberdeen | Sustained Study | No |
Co-ordinators |
|
Advanced Clinical Practitioners make a positive contribution to patient safety, but it is recognised that the benefits of the role are not fully realised. ACPs can be viewed as a ‘complex intervention’ which can have impact across the care system in which they operate. Understanding this is challenging – the ACP role is relatively new, so much of the ‘performance’ data is drawn from novice practitioners. ACPs themselves recognise that they need ongoing education and training to support their professional development. Related to this is that there appears to be a strong implicit assumption that the ACP role is primarily about ‘medical substitution’ rather than a role with the potential to transform services by bringing a different skills mix to the team.
ACPs have been shown to make a strong contribution to medication safety. Medicines review and reconciliation by ACPs has been shown to reduce medication errors, and their support for patients in terms of lifestyle management can reduce the need for medication. This role could be further enhanced by increasing CPD for ACPs in both medication safety and incident reporting and investigation. This aligns with the World Health Organization’s 3rd Global Patient Safety Challenge, Medication without Harm.
Medication safety emerges from a complex prescribing environment. Human Factors specialists recognise as an issue the gap that exists between ‘work-as-imagined’ (what we think healthcare staff do, based on what is captured in ‘official’ procedures and processes) and ‘work-as-done’ (what really happens in practice). ‘Work-as-done’ reflects adaptations that are made by staff which are necessary if desired outcomes are to be achieved despite the variable demands of health and social care systems.
Many of these demands are familiar to staff – they include things like the high demand for care, under-staffing, fatigue, distractions and the cognitive burden imposed by challenging medication-related tasks. However, other demands are less obvious: many of the safety controls in medication pathways are social and/or administrative. Such controls are weak – they rely on the behaviour of people within the system. However, they are often necessary because of poor design of the tools and technologies used by prescribers.
‘Safe and effective’ are words that are frequently used by regulators to describe the expected performance of healthcare professionals. However, what is almost universally lacking is practical guidance to support the development and maintenance of safety competencies. Human Factors, as a person-centred safety science, has much to offer when it comes to supporting health care practitioners in developing practical safety skills and competencies. The course content will provide a thorough introduction to the core Human Factors principles of systems thinking and user-centred design. Students will have the opportunity to apply Human Factors frameworks, methods and tools to practical real-life medication safety problems. There will also be an opportunity to learn how systems-thinking principles can underpin better procedure design, and there will be a specific focus on how a Human Factors approach can support more effective incident reporting and learning, with the final assessment taking the format of a report of an incident investigation.
Information on contact teaching time is available from the course guide.
Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 100 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | 39 | Feedback Weeks | 42 | |
Feedback |
Word Count: 3,000 Incident investigation report Students will submit a 3000-word report describing a partial systems analysis of a relevant medication-related incident using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety as a framework. This can be an incident of their own choice or can be provided by the tutor. Individual written feedback will be provided. |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Conceptual | Analyse | Explore and critically comment on the application of Human Factors and quality improvement of medicine use in healthcare with a focus on patient safety. |
Procedural | Analyse | Analyse medication incidents using a Human Factors approach to underpin effective learning |
Reflection | Evaluate | Demonstrate the ability to identify potential and existing high-risk tasks, activities, and environments relating to medication use |
Assessment Type | Formative | Weighting | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | 30 | Feedback Weeks | 31 | |
Feedback |
The plan will be worked on throughout the early weeks of the course, with a written copy submitted. Feedback will be in the form of a 1:1 session with the tutor (by Teams). |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Conceptual | Analyse | Explore and critically comment on the application of Human Factors and quality improvement of medicine use in healthcare with a focus on patient safety. |
Procedural | Analyse | Analyse medication incidents using a Human Factors approach to underpin effective learning |
Reflection | Evaluate | Demonstrate the ability to identify potential and existing high-risk tasks, activities, and environments relating to medication use |
Assessment Type | Formative | Weighting | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | 33 | Feedback Weeks | 34 | |
Feedback |
To complete an individual hierarchical task analysis and human reliability-assessment for an activity set by the tutor. To be worked on during practical sessions and to be submitted to dropbox by the end of week 33. Video feedback will provided. Task analysis will form part of the summative systems analysis in the final assessment.. |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Conceptual | Analyse | Explore and critically comment on the application of Human Factors and quality improvement of medicine use in healthcare with a focus on patient safety. |
Procedural | Analyse | Analyse medication incidents using a Human Factors approach to underpin effective learning |
Reflection | Evaluate | Demonstrate the ability to identify potential and existing high-risk tasks, activities, and environments relating to medication use |
Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 100 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | 46 | Feedback Weeks | 49 | |
Feedback |
Word Count: 3,000 Written feedback and a one-to-one session to discuss improvement strategy before submitted |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
|
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Reflection | Evaluate | Demonstrate the ability to identify potential and existing high-risk tasks, activities, and environments relating to medication use |
Procedural | Analyse | Analyse medication incidents using a Human Factors approach to underpin effective learning |
Conceptual | Analyse | Explore and critically comment on the application of Human Factors and quality improvement of medicine use in healthcare with a focus on patient safety. |
We have detected that you are have compatibility mode enabled or are using an old version of Internet Explorer. You either need to switch off compatibility mode for this site or upgrade your browser.