Last modified: 31 May 2022 13:05
Readings in Philosophy and Society is a directed reading course offering students the opportunity to engage at length and in depth with the philosophical literature on a topic relevant to problems or questions concerning society. Students will choose from a list of approved topics made available at the beginning of each year and will be subject to the availability of Philosophy staff to supervise. Assessment will include one review of a paper/book of 1,500 words (20%) and one essay of 4,000 words (80%).
| Study Type | Postgraduate | Level | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Term | First Term | Credit Points | 30 credits (15 ECTS credits) |
| Campus | Aberdeen | Sustained Study | No |
| Co-ordinators |
|
||
The course is a required element of the MLitt in Philosophy and Society degree. It is a directed reading course and the content of the course will depend on the interests of the student and the availability of Philosophy staff to supervise on the topic during any given year. Students will each select a topic from a list of approved options that will be provided at the beginning of each year. The structure of the course is supervised reading, research, and discussion. Students will be assigned to a staff member in the relevant field who, in discussion with the student, will develop a list of specific reading areas to be covered over the semester and to offer initial guidance (e.g. questions, reading lists, potential essay topics). Students will conduct reading related to the topic and meet the supervisor (and other students if applicable) every two weeks to discuss their reading and progress on the review and essay. Thus, students will receive approximately 6 hours of supervision over the 12-week period. Assessment will include one review of a paper/book of 1,500 words (20%) and one essay of 4,000 words (80%).
Information on contact teaching time is available from the course guide.
| Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 80 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment Weeks | 20 | Feedback Weeks | 25 | |
| Feedback |
The essay will receive in-text as well as overall comments with the aim of providing feedback on the quality of presentation, strength of argumentation, depth of analysis and evaluation, and overall conclusion. It will be subject to moderation. |
Word Count | 4000 | |
| Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
| Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment Weeks | 12 | Feedback Weeks | 15 | |
| Feedback |
One review of a paper/book of 1,500 words (20%). The paper/book review will receive in-text as well as overall comments with the aim of providing feedback on the quality of analysis and evaluation, as well as on writing-style and structure. |
|||
| Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
There are no assessments for this course.
| Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 100 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment Weeks | Feedback Weeks | |||
| Feedback |
The essay will receive in-text as well as overall comments with the aim of providing feedback on the quality of presentation, strength of argumentation, depth of analysis and evaluation, and overall conclusion. It will be subject to moderation. |
Word Count | 5000 | |
| Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
| Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Conceptual | Analyse | Engage critically with debates and issues in the philosophy of religion by understanding and critically appreciating primary texts and their central arguments. |
| Procedural | Create | Develop public presentation skills and to lead seminar discussions in an informed and structured way. |
| Factual | Understand | Acquire knowledge of topics, debates and problems in philosophy of religion by close study of classic works in the history of the tradition. |
| Conceptual | Apply | Develop their capacity for philosophical reasoning, research and writing. |
| Conceptual | Create | Express complex philosophical ideas and judgement in both oral and written arguments. |
We have detected that you are have compatibility mode enabled or are using an old version of Internet Explorer. You either need to switch off compatibility mode for this site or upgrade your browser.
