Last modified: 25 Sep 2019 09:58
This course offers students the opportunity to complete a substantial piece of data-driven, empirical work within their field of study, under the supervision of an experienced researcher. Topics available will be varied but within the domain of their field of study. Alongside supervisors, students will identify a suitable topic area, describe an appropriate study design and implement an empirical study. Students will be involved alongside the supervisors in the process of defining the research question, and developing the research protocol, and where appropriate obtaining all regulatory approvals.
Study Type | Postgraduate | Level | 5 |
---|---|---|---|
Term | Third Term | Credit Points | 60 credits (30 ECTS credits) |
Campus | Aberdeen | Sustained Study | No |
Co-ordinators |
|
To give the students direct experience of the management and delivering of a research project, either in a laboratory, academic, clinical or public health setting.
Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | 50 | Feedback Weeks | 50 | |
Feedback |
SMMSN standard rubric |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
|
Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 15 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | 48 | Feedback Weeks | 50 | |
Feedback |
Initial results presenattion - feedback will be provided immediately through quetsions and sanswers adn within 2 weeks using the rubric |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
|
Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | 50 | Feedback Weeks | 2 | |
Feedback |
feedback in the form of peer reveiw comments and stadard SMMSN rubric |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
|
Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 15 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | 38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49 | Feedback Weeks | 40,42,44,46,48,50 | |
Feedback |
Weekly reflective log - feedback provided throiugh myABerdeen fortnightly, final grade provided through SMMSN rubric reflective report |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
|
Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | 50 | Feedback Weeks | 2 | |
Feedback |
Conference communictaion of results - feedback using standrad SMMSN rubric |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
|
Assessment Type | Formative | Weighting | 0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Weeks | 38 | Feedback Weeks | 40 | |
Feedback |
Protocol Peer review - no opportunity for resit ( this os a formative ) |
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
|
Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Conceptual | Create | Review relevant literature to produce an evidence–based problem statement |
Conceptual | Create | Develop a clear research question or hypothesis to address the identified problem statement |
Conceptual | Create | Describe and justify the methodological approach adopted to address the research question or hypothesis |
Procedural | Apply | Demonstrate practical experience with data collection and management |
Procedural | Analyse | Analyse, interpret and present project data appropriately |
Procedural | Create | Communicate project outputs according to recognised standards and format within discipline |
Procedural | Understand | Demonstrate knowledge of and compliance with all relevant regulatory, professional and ethical standards |
Reflection | Apply | Demonstrate professional practice in the management of research project including time-management, record keeping, confidentiality, communication and team work |
We have detected that you are have compatibility mode enabled or are using an old version of Internet Explorer. You either need to switch off compatibility mode for this site or upgrade your browser.