Environmental case for vertical farming stacks up - according to new study

Environmental case for vertical farming stacks up - according to new study

Growing lettuce on stacked shelves in high-tech greenhouses could be as good for the environment as growing them in fields and could save 8,000 hectares of land in the UK, according to a new study from the University of Aberdeen and the University of Surrey.

Researchers studied a vertical lettuce farm in the UK. They found it produced the equivalent of 740g of carbon dioxide (CO2) per kilo of lettuce. This was comparable to growing in a field – but used a lot less land.

Dr Zoe M Harris, co-author of the study and a Senior Lecturer at Surrey’s Centre for Environment and Sustainability, said:

“Our findings show that vertical farms can help reduce the climate impact of farming, especially if their electricity comes from renewable sources.

“Vertical farming uses about 28 times less land than traditional farming methods. If all lettuce fields were replaced with vertical farms, we could save over 8,000 hectares in the UK alone.

“That could free up land to grow other crops. Vertical farms can also be built in cities, significantly reducing the impact of transporting the crop to the people who eat them.

“Our study is an important first step towards demonstrating the impacts of vertical farming being greener than first thought, despite only having a limited data range available.”

In vertical farms, shelves of crops like lettuce or herbs are stacked on top of each other in a controlled environment. Plants can grow without soil – drip-fed with nutrient-rich water or even with mist sprayed onto their exposed roots.

Professor Astley Hastings, Reader in environmental science at the University of Aberdeen, said: “This study compared the environmental footprint of vertically farmed lettuce to that sourced from by UK supermarkets from the UK and Spain and found that they were similar in magnitude but different in origin.

“Vertical farming reduced land use impacts, but its overall impact was dependant of the way the electricity it used was generated, whilst the Spanish sourced lettuce impact was dominated by transport and irrigation and the UK lettuce was grown on peat soils and their degradation dominated the impact.”

In the lettuce farm studied, electricity use made up nearly 40% of its total climate change impact. As such, the climate impact of vertical farming depends a lot on how that electricity is generated.

The researchers also studied other environmental impacts like land use, water use, and water pollution.

Michael Gargaro, a researcher at Surrey’s Centre for Environment and Sustainability, said: One of the biggest environmental impacts came from the jute plugs the lettuce seeds are grown in. They made up 18% of the climate change impact, as well as the lion’s share of the water pollution and land use too.

“Using another material could make a vertical farm even more sustainable. Future research should consider alternatives like coconut fibre, hemp or perlite.

“We hope this study inspires further research into the sustainability of the food sector.”

The link to the study can be found here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624027732?via%3Dihub 

Search News

Browse by Month

2024

  1. Jan
  2. Feb
  3. Mar
  4. Apr
  5. May
  6. Jun
  7. Jul
  8. Aug
  9. Sep There are no items to show for September 2024
  10. Oct There are no items to show for October 2024
  11. Nov There are no items to show for November 2024
  12. Dec There are no items to show for December 2024

2004

  1. Jan
  2. Feb
  3. Mar
  4. Apr
  5. May
  6. Jun
  7. Jul
  8. Aug
  9. Sep
  10. Oct
  11. Nov There are no items to show for November 2004
  12. Dec

2003

  1. Jan
  2. Feb
  3. Mar
  4. Apr
  5. May
  6. Jun
  7. Jul
  8. Aug
  9. Sep
  10. Oct
  11. Nov
  12. Dec There are no items to show for December 2003

1999

  1. Jan There are no items to show for January 1999
  2. Feb There are no items to show for February 1999
  3. Mar
  4. Apr
  5. May
  6. Jun
  7. Jul
  8. Aug
  9. Sep
  10. Oct
  11. Nov
  12. Dec

1998

  1. Jan
  2. Feb
  3. Mar
  4. Apr There are no items to show for April 1998
  5. May
  6. Jun
  7. Jul There are no items to show for July 1998
  8. Aug There are no items to show for August 1998
  9. Sep
  10. Oct
  11. Nov There are no items to show for November 1998
  12. Dec